Comments on: Extending Flex 3 Components http://mchristoff.com/2009/08/extending-flex-3-components/ Participating in Life. Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:27:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Michael Christoff http://mchristoff.com/2009/08/extending-flex-3-components/comment-page-1/#comment-1484 Michael Christoff Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:33:34 +0000 http://mchristoff.com/?p=56#comment-1484 I haven't had a chance to try that, but it seems like it could work. I'm not quite sure if the itemRenderer can effect change on the icon though. Have you given this a try to see if you can get the same result?<br><br>Either way, I think fundamentally the default behavior of the Tree should behave like IconTree. I've ended up having to this kind of thing to various different flex components as well so I hope it serves as a good tutorial for anyone who's just getting their feat wet digging into the innards of the flex framework. I haven't had a chance to try that, but it seems like it could work. I'm not quite sure if the itemRenderer can effect change on the icon though. Have you given this a try to see if you can get the same result?

Either way, I think fundamentally the default behavior of the Tree should behave like IconTree. I've ended up having to this kind of thing to various different flex components as well so I hope it serves as a good tutorial for anyone who's just getting their feat wet digging into the innards of the flex framework.

]]> By: NotAGuru http://mchristoff.com/2009/08/extending-flex-3-components/comment-page-1/#comment-1482 NotAGuru Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:54:37 +0000 http://mchristoff.com/?p=56#comment-1482 Why not just assign a class that extends the TreeItemRenderer as the itemRenderer of the Tree? Why not just assign a class that extends the TreeItemRenderer as the itemRenderer of the Tree?

]]>